Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.)


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011



ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9
Online Edition
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011 
2012,  344 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert
€  50,–   
Open access


Introduction
Maria Rita Testa, Tomás Sobotka and Philip S. Morgan: Reproductive decision-making: towards improved theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches.
Demographic Debate
S. Philip Morgan and Christine A. Bachrach: Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility?
Warren B. Miller: Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework
Jennifer Barber: The Theory of Planned Behaviour: considering drives, proximity and dynamics
Dimiter Philipov: Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer's perspective
Jane Klobas: The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions
Aart C. Liefbroer: On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility research
Icek Ajzen: Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach's critique
Christine A. Bachrach and S. Philip Morgan: Further reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and fertility research
Refereed Articles
Warren B. Miller: Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy
Máire Ní Bhrolcháin and Éva Beaujouan: Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007
Saskia Hin, Anne Gauthier, Joshua Goldstein and Christoph Bühler: Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us
Maria Rita Testa, Laura Cavalli and Alessandro Rosina: Couple´s childbearing behaviour in Italy: which of the partners is leading it?
Nicoletta Balbo and Melinda Mills: The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions
Markus Kotte and Volker Ludwig: Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: the role of contagion
David De Wachter and Karel Neels: Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s
Clémentine Rossier, Sara Brachet and Anne Salles: Family policies, norms about gender roles and fertility decisions in France and Germany
Anna Rotkirch, Stuart Basten, Heini Väisänen and Markus Jokela: Baby longing and men's reproductive motivation
Anna Baranowska and Anna Matysiak: Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence for Poland
Data and Trends (non-refereed contributions)
Jennifer S. Barber, Yasamin Kusunoki and Heather Gatny : Design and implementation of an online weekly survey to study unintended pregnancies
Beatrice Chromková Manea and Petr Fucík: Couples disagreement about fertility preferences and family-friendly policy measures in the Czech Republic

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at

Bestellung/Order


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011
ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9
Online Edition



Send or fax to your local bookseller or to:

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2,
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: bestellung.verlag@oeaw.ac.at
UID-Nr.: ATU 16251605, FN 71839x Handelsgericht Wien, DVR: 0096385

Bitte senden Sie mir
Please send me
 
Exemplar(e) der genannten Publikation
copy(ies) of the publication overleaf


NAME


ADRESSE / ADDRESS


ORT / CITY


LAND / COUNTRY


ZAHLUNGSMETHODE / METHOD OF PAYMENT
    Visa     Euro / Master     American Express


NUMMER

Ablaufdatum / Expiry date:  

    I will send a cheque           Vorausrechnung / Send me a proforma invoice
 
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE

BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s283



Thema: journals
Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.)


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011



ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9
Online Edition
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011 
2012,  344 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert
€  50,–   
Open access


Anna Rotkirch, Stuart Basten, Heini Väisänen, Markus Jokela
PDF Icon  Baby longing and men’s reproductive motivation ()
S.  283 - 306
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s283

Open access

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

Abstract:
Childbearing in low-fertility societies sometimes results from a strong desire to have a(nother) child. Since women tend to dominate discussions on ‘baby longing’ or ‘baby fever’, it is not clear whether men also feel the powerful urge to have a child. Moreover, the demographic importance of baby longing has yet to be assessed. Using cross-sectional surveys from contemporary Finland and focusing on men, we analyse gender differences in baby longing. Both sexes report having felt an intense longing to have a child of their own at least once or a few times in their lives. A higher proportion of men say they have never longed for a child, while a higher proportion of women report having felt this longing frequently. Baby longing figures at different stages of the Traits- Desires-Intentions-Behaviour scheme of reproductive behaviour. For a small minority of men, longing first appears in youth. Baby longing among men most commonly plays into childbearing desires preceding attempts to achieve pregnancy. However, about every third man reports having first felt this longing only when trying to have a child. Baby longing among men is unrelated to economic and educational status, but it is associated with marital status, fertility intentions and the number of lifetime unions. Compared to its effects on women, baby longing among men is reported to result in having a child less often and to have less influence on childbearing decisions. We conclude that women’s longing shapes the couple’s fertility behaviour to a slightly higher degree than men’s longing does, especially with regards to higher parities. Men’s baby longing may be especially important for sustaining proceptive behaviour and preparing for fatherhood.

  2012/02/02 15:37:52
Object Identifier:  0xc1aa5576 0x002a70ff
.

Introduction
Maria Rita Testa, Tomás Sobotka and Philip S. Morgan: Reproductive decision-making: towards improved theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches.
Demographic Debate
S. Philip Morgan and Christine A. Bachrach: Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility?
Warren B. Miller: Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework
Jennifer Barber: The Theory of Planned Behaviour: considering drives, proximity and dynamics
Dimiter Philipov: Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer's perspective
Jane Klobas: The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions
Aart C. Liefbroer: On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility research
Icek Ajzen: Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach's critique
Christine A. Bachrach and S. Philip Morgan: Further reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and fertility research
Refereed Articles
Warren B. Miller: Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy
Máire Ní Bhrolcháin and Éva Beaujouan: Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007
Saskia Hin, Anne Gauthier, Joshua Goldstein and Christoph Bühler: Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us
Maria Rita Testa, Laura Cavalli and Alessandro Rosina: Couple´s childbearing behaviour in Italy: which of the partners is leading it?
Nicoletta Balbo and Melinda Mills: The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions
Markus Kotte and Volker Ludwig: Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: the role of contagion
David De Wachter and Karel Neels: Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s
Clémentine Rossier, Sara Brachet and Anne Salles: Family policies, norms about gender roles and fertility decisions in France and Germany
Anna Rotkirch, Stuart Basten, Heini Väisänen and Markus Jokela: Baby longing and men's reproductive motivation
Anna Baranowska and Anna Matysiak: Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence for Poland
Data and Trends (non-refereed contributions)
Jennifer S. Barber, Yasamin Kusunoki and Heather Gatny : Design and implementation of an online weekly survey to study unintended pregnancies
Beatrice Chromková Manea and Petr Fucík: Couples disagreement about fertility preferences and family-friendly policy measures in the Czech Republic

REFERENCES
Basten, S. 2009. Neuroscience and parental behaviour. The Future of Human Reproduction Working Papers 2. http://www.sjc.ox.ac.uk/3152/WP44%20Neuroscience%20and%20parental%20behaviour.pdf.download

Berrington, A. 2004. Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends 117: 9-19.

Bonke, J. and G. Esping-Andersen 2009. Family investments in children – productivities, preferences, and parental child care. European Sociological Review 27(1): 33-55.

Booth, A. and A. Crouter (eds.) 1998. Men in families. When do they get involved? What difference does it make? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. confessionsofameanmommy.com 2009. Baby lust and how it clashes with mean mommyhood. http://www.confessionsofameanmommy.com/baby-lust-and-how-itclashes-with-mean-mommyhood

Brase, G.L. and S.L. Brase 2011. Emotional regulation of fertility decision making: What is the nature and structure of ‘baby fever’? Emotion, advance online publication 15.8. de Bruijn, B.J. 1999. Foundations of demographic theory. Choice, process, context. Amsterdam: Thela thesis.

Fernandez-Duque, E., C.R. Valeggia, and S.P. Mendoza 2009. The biology of paternal care in human and nonhuman primates. Annual Review of Anthropology 38: 115-130.

Fleming, A.S., C. Corter, J. Stallings and M. Steiner 2002. Testosterone and prolactin are associated with emotional responses to infant cries in new fathers. Hormones and Behavior 42: 399-413.

Forste, R. 2002. Where are all the men?: A conceptual analysis of the role of men in family formation. Journal of Family Issues 23(5): 579-600.

Goldstein, J., W. Lutz and M.R. Testa 2003. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 479-496.

Gordon, I., O. Zagoory-Sharon, J.F. Leckman and R. Feldman 2010a. Oxytocin and the development of parenting in humans. Biol Psychiatry 68:377-382.

Gordon, I., O. Zagoory-Sharon, J.F. Leckman and R. Feldman 2010b. Prolactin, oxytocin, and the development of paternal behavior across the first six months of fatherhood. Hormones and Behavior 58: 513-518.

Henwood, K. 2009. On delayed fatherhood: The social and subjective ‘logics’ at work in men’s lives (a UK Study). In The Future of Motherhood in Western Societies, ed. Beets, G., Schippers, J. and te Velde, 155-175. EAmsterdam: Springer.

Hopcroft, R.L. 2006. Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior 27(2): 104-120.

Jamieson, L., K. B. Milburn, R. Simpson and F. Wasoff 2010. Fertility and social change: The neglected contribution of men’s approaches to becoming partners and parents. The Sociological Review 58: 463-485.

Jokela, M., A. Rotkirch, I.J. Rickard, J. Pettay and V. Lummaa 2010. Serial monogamy increases reproductive success in men but not in women. Behavioral Ecology 21:906-912.

Kaplan, H., J. Lancaster and K. G. Anderson 1998. Human parental investment and fertility: the life histories of men in Albuquerque. In Men in families. When do they get involved? What difference does it make?, ed. A. Booth and A. Crouter, 55-109. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kravdal, Ø. and R.R. Rindfuss 2008. Changing relationships between education and fertility: a study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review 5: 854-873.

Lamb, M.E. 2010. The role of the father in child development. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Maestripieri, D. 1999. The biology of human parenting: Insights from nonhuman primates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 23: 411-422.

Maestripieri, D. 2011. Emotions, stress, and maternal motivation in primates. American Journal of Primatology 73:516-529.

Maestripieri, D., J.R. Roney, N. De Bias, K.M. Durante and G.M. Spaepen 2004. Father absence, menarche and interest in infants among adolescent girls. Developmental Science 7(5): 560-566.

Miettinen, A. and A. Rotkirch 2008. Milloin on lapsen aika. Lastenhankinnan aikeet ja esteet [When is the right time for children? Fertility intentions and barriers]. Family barometer 2008. E34. Helsinki: Population Research Institute, Väestöliitto.

Miettinen, A., A. Rotkirch and S. Basten 2011. Gender equity and fertility revisited. Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research 24(20): 469-496.

Miller, W.B. 1986. Proception: an important fertility behavior. Demography 23: 579-94.

Miller, W.B. 1992. Personality traits and developmental experiences as antecedents of childbearing motivation. Demography 29: 265-85.

Miller, W.B. 2001. The ontogeny of human bonding systems: Evolutionary origins, neural bases, and psychological manifestations. Boston: Kluwer.

Miller, W.B. 2011. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Vol.9: 75-98.

Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1995. Behavioral intentions: which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25: 530-555.

Miller, W.B., D.E. Bard, D.J. Pasta and J.L. Rodgers 2010. Biodemographic modeling of the links between fertility motivation and fertility outcomes in the NLSY79. Demography 47(2): 393-414.

Miller, W.B., L. Severy and D.J. Pasta 2004. A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies 58(2): 193-205.

Mills, D. 2010. Why can’t men be broody too? Women aren’t the only ones with biological clocks. The difference is that they can talk about it. The Daily Mail 27.9.2010. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1315456/Women-arent-onesbiological-clocks-says-wannabe-dad.html

Nettle, D. 2008. Why do some dads get more involved than others? Evidence from a large British cohort. Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 416-23.

Nettle, D. 2011. Flexibility in reproductive timing in humans: integrating ultimate and proximate explanations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B366: 357- 365.

Nettle, D. and T.V. Pollet 2008. Natural selection on male wealth in humans. The American Naturalist 172(5): 658-66.

Paajanen, Pirjo 2007. Mikä on minun perheeni? – Suomalaisten käsityksiä perheestä vuosilta 2007 ja 1997. [Who belongs to my family? Finns family perceptions in 2007 and 1997.] Family barometer 2007, E 30. Helsinki: Population Research Institute, Väestöliitto.

Pikul, C. 2011. The clockwatcher. How do you know when - or if - you should have a baby? American ELLE magazine February: 164-166.

Population Research Institute 2011. Facts and figures: fertility in Finland. http://www.vaestoliitto.fi/in_english/population_research_institute/facts-andfigures/fertility-in-finland

Puur, A., L.Sz. Oláh, M. I. Tazi-Preve and J. Dorbritz 2008. Men’s childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century. Demographic Research 19: 1883-1912.

Roberts, E., A. Metcalfe, M. Jack and S.C. Tough 2011 Factors that influence the childbearing intentions of Canadian men. Human Reproduction 26(5):1202-1208.

Rotkirch, A. 2007. ‘All that she wants is another baby?’ Longing for children as a fertility incentive of growing importance. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 5(1-4): 89-104.

Rotkirch, A. 2008. What is ‘baby fever’? Contrasting evolutionary explanations of proceptive behavior. In The new evolutionary social science. Human nature, social behaviour and social change, ed. Meleghy, T., Meyer, P. and Niedenzu, H-J., Boulder, 147-158. CO: Paradigm Publishers.

Silk, J.B. 2003. Natal attraction in adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) in the Moremi reserve, Botswana. Ethology 109(8): 627-644.

Statistics Finland 2010. Vital statistics 2008. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.

Thomson, E. 1997. Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography 34(3): 343-354.

Thomson, E. and J.M. Hoem 1998. Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography 35(3): 315-322.

Thomson, E., E. McDonald and L.L. Bumpass 1990. Fertility desires and fertility: hers, his, theirs. Demography 27(4): 579-588.

Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971, ed. Campbell, B., .136-179. Chicago: Aldine.

Von der Lippe, H. 2010. Motivation and selection processes in a biographical transition: a psychological mixed methods study on the transition into fatherhood. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4(3): 199-211.



Inhaltsverzeichnisse und Leseproben sind frei zugänglich. Tables of Contents and Reading examples are freely accessible.
Vergessen Sie nicht das Login am Server, wenn Sie auf Kapitel zugreifen wollen, die nicht allgemein zugänglich sind.
Links zu diesen Dokumenten werden erst nach dem Login sichtbar.
Do not forget to Login on the server if you want to access chapters that are not freely accessible.
Links to these documents will only be visible after logon.

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at