Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011
|
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011
ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition ISSN 1728-5305 Online Edition ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2 Print Edition ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9 Online Edition
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011 2012, 344 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert € 50,–
Beatrice Chromková Manuea,
Petr Fučík
S. 335 - 344 doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s335 Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Abstract: This article describes some findings of an ad-hoc survey “Marriage, Work and Family” conducted in the Czech Republic in 2005. The analysis is focused on couple disagreement about childbearing attitudes, ideals and intentions as well as on the partners’ negotiation process in reproductive decision-making. The results indicate that around one-fifth of Czech couples disagree about the intended number of children. The relatively high share of concordance between partners is the final outcome of a negotiation process within the couple in most cases. The more general the childbearing preferences measures, the higher the level of couple disagreement: one-third of the couples disagree about the family size ideals and two-thirds of them disagree about the reasons for having children. Moreover, one-fourth of Czech partners disagree about the impact of different policy measures on their own reproductive behaviour. This suggests that the potential for a couple’s conflict is quite high and that policy-makers willing to implement effective family-friendly policy measures should target their intervention not only to women but to men as well. Published Online: 2012/02/02 15:45:19 Object Identifier: 0xc1aa5576 0x002a7102 Rights: .
Introduction
|
||
REFERENCES | ||
Becker, S. 1996. Couples and reproductive health: a review of couple studies. Studies in Family Planning 27(6): 291-306. |
||
Becker, S. 1999. Measuring unmet need: wives, husbands or couples? International Family Planning Perspectives 25(4): 172-180. |
||
Berrington, A. 2009. Perpetual postponers? Womens, mens and couples fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. S3RI Applications Working Paper A04/09. |
||
Chromková Manea, B.E. and P. Fucík 2007. Teorie konfliktních preferencí a plodnost v Ceské republice. Demografie-revue pro výzkum populacního vývoje 49(4): 244-252. |
||
Chromková Manea, B.E., M. Mrázová and L. Rabuic 2006. Teorie zaloené na lidských preferencích jako moný príspevek k vysvetlení soucasného reprodukcního chování. In Rodina, zamestnání a sociální politika, ed. Sirovátka et al., 57-79. 1. vyd. Brno : Frantiek alé ALBERT, Fakulta sociálních studií Masarykovy university. |
||
DaVanzo, J. et al. 2003. How well do desired fertility measures for wives and husbands predict subsequent fertility? Evidence from Malaysia. DRU-3013-NICHD. Labour and Population Program Working Paper Series 03-16. |
||
Fucík, P. and B.E. Chromková Manea 2008. V rozporu, ci jednotní? Postoje páru k opatrením prorodinné politiky v CR. Sociální studia 5(2): 69-87. |
||
Hakim, C. 2000. Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
||
Hakim, C. 2003. A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory. Population and Development Review 29: 349-374. |
||
Rabuic, L. and B.E. Chromková Manea 2007. Preferencní teorie Hakimové v ceském kontextu. Demografie : Revue pro výzkum populacního vývoje 49(2): 77-86. |
||
Thomson, E. 1997. Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography 34(3): 343-354. |
||
Thomson, E.and Jan M. Hoem 1998. Couple Childbearing Plans and Births in Sweden. Demography 35(3): 315-322. |
||
Voas, D. 2003. Conflicting preferences: a reason fertility tends to be too high or too low. Population and Development Review 29(4): 627-646. |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |