![]() |
![]() |
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 5. Jahrgang Band 2 / 2015 Frühneuzeitliche Supplikationspraxis und monarchische Herrschaft in europäischer Perspektive
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
![]() |
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|
![]() |
![]() |
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 5. Jahrgang Band 2 / 2015 Frühneuzeitliche Supplikationspraxis und monarchische Herrschaft in europäischer Perspektive
![]()
ISSN 2221-8890
Print Edition ISSN 2224-4905 Online Edition ISBN 978-3-7001-7867-5 Print Edition ISBN 978-3-7001-7917-7 Online Edition
doi:10.1553/BRGOE2015-2
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2/2015 2015, 192 Seiten, 29,7x21cm, broschiert € 59,00 ![]()
Thomas Schreiber
S. 215 - 230 doi:10.1553/BRGOE2015-2s215 ![]() Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Abstract: Based on the analysis of about 700 cases, the article presents first results of a German-Austrian research project on mediate subjects’ petitions handled by the Imperial Aulic Council in the reign of Rudolf II, focusing on conceptual and procedural questions. To get a clearer picture of the variety of the requests (and to avoid conceptual confusion), it is helpful to consider the formal structure of these texts. Whereas in the ‘narratio’ the authors described what made them address the Emperor, the ‘petitio’ details what measures they asked the Emperor to take. Supplicants applying for a favour tended to highlight a special bond to the Empire’s head (e.g. services rendered). On the contrary, supplicants asking for the Emperor’s assistance with regard to a conflict in which they were involved – either because of (economic) claims they could not get satisfied or in the wake of criminal persecution by local authorities – mostly referred to the necessity of the Emperor’s intervention to overcome their difficulties. Moreover, the Imperial Aulic Council’s decisions mirror these distinctions: While next to all applications for a favour were granted, the Council showed more reluctance to interfere with local authorities’ actions, especially in criminal matters. Keywords: Emperor Rudolf II, grace, Holy Roman Empire, Imperial Aulic Council, petitions, supplications, social history Published Online: 2015/12/11 12:25:33 Object Identifier: 0xc1aa5576 0x00329a39 Rights: .
Gabriele HAUG-MORITZ, Graz/Sabine ULLMANN, Eichstätt …
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |