Bild

Triglav National Park, Slovenia, and its contribution to regional development

    Matej Gabrovec, Blaž Komac, Jani Kozina, Katarina Polajnar Horvat, Janez Nared, Aleš Smrekar, Maja Topole, Mimi Urbanc

Eco.mont Vol. 9 special issue, pp. 57-65, 2017/01/13

Journal on Protected Mountain Areas Research and Management

doi: 10.1553/eco.mont-9-sis57

doi: 10.1553/eco.mont-9-sis57


PDF
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

doi:10.1553/eco.mont-9-sis57



doi:10.1553/eco.mont-9-sis57

Abstract

Triglav National Park is the only national park (NP) in Slovenia. Its protection measures have always been publicly disputed and its impact questioned. This paper identifies and assesses the impact of the park on regional development. It compares two kinds of data: the municipal development coefficient based on statistical data and residents’ attitudes toward the park, based on analysis of a survey, newspapers, and public debates. Triglav NP is located in two regions: Goriška and Gorenjska. Our results show that the municipalities in Gorenjska are better developed; however, the development trends in these municipalities are decreasing, whereas in the Goriška region they are increasing, overall reducing the regional differences between the two parts of the park. Text analyses reveal that lack of clarity in the management, boundaries and funding of the park, as well as inconsistency with existing legislation and international standards, have resulted in constant conflicts, which have impeded regional development. We argue that, once the conflicts are solved and local communities perceive positive changes as a result of implementing the law, progressive effects developing the protected area will follow. Triglav NP has the potential for long-term positive impacts on regional development if there is sound legislation, if this legislation is effectively implemented and if an active participatory process is put in place.

Keywords: Triglav National Park, Slovenia, regional development, protected areas, ownership conflict, participation