Bild

Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework

    Warren B. Miller

Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011, pp. 19-29, 2012/02/02

doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s19


PDF
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s19


Introduction
Maria Rita Testa, Tomás Sobotka and Philip S. Morgan: Reproductive decision-making: towards improved theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches.
Demographic Debate
S. Philip Morgan and Christine A. Bachrach: Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility?
Warren B. Miller: Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework
Jennifer Barber: The Theory of Planned Behaviour: considering drives, proximity and dynamics
Dimiter Philipov: Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer's perspective
Jane Klobas: The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions
Aart C. Liefbroer: On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility research
Icek Ajzen: Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach's critique
Christine A. Bachrach and S. Philip Morgan: Further reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and fertility research
Refereed Articles
Warren B. Miller: Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy
Máire Ní Bhrolcháin and Éva Beaujouan: Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007
Saskia Hin, Anne Gauthier, Joshua Goldstein and Christoph Bühler: Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us
Maria Rita Testa, Laura Cavalli and Alessandro Rosina: Couple´s childbearing behaviour in Italy: which of the partners is leading it?
Nicoletta Balbo and Melinda Mills: The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions
Markus Kotte and Volker Ludwig: Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: the role of contagion
David De Wachter and Karel Neels: Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s
Clémentine Rossier, Sara Brachet and Anne Salles: Family policies, norms about gender roles and fertility decisions in France and Germany
Anna Rotkirch, Stuart Basten, Heini Väisänen and Markus Jokela: Baby longing and men's reproductive motivation
Anna Baranowska and Anna Matysiak: Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence for Poland
Data and Trends (non-refereed contributions)
Jennifer S. Barber, Yasamin Kusunoki and Heather Gatny : Design and implementation of an online weekly survey to study unintended pregnancies
Beatrice Chromková Manea and Petr Fucík: Couples disagreement about fertility preferences and family-friendly policy measures in the Czech Republic

Published Online: 2012/02/02 14:36:44

Object Identifier: 0xc1aa5572 0x002a70ee

Document viewed: Calculating...

Rights: All rights reserved. For questions regarding copyright and copies please contact us by email.

REFERENCES Ajzen, I. 2010. Fertility intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Paper presented at the conference “From intentions to behavior: reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective“. Vienna, Austria. 2-3 December 2010. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/in2b/Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein 2008. Scaling and testing multiplicative combinations in the expectancy-value model of attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(9): 2222-2247.Albarracin, D., B.T. Johnson, M. Fishbein and P.A. Muellerleile 2001. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 127(1): 142-161.Bachrach, C.A. and S. Newcomer 1999. Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 251-252.Bargh, J.A. and E. Morsella 2008. The unconscious mind. Perspectives in Psychological Science 3(1): 73-79.Finer, L.B., L.D. Lindberg, S. Singh and C. Stokes-Prindle 2007. Unpublished report to expert panel on pregnancy wantedness. Washington, DC, 10 May.Gollwitzer, P.M. and J.A. Bargh 2005. Automaticity in goal pursuit. In Handbook of competence and motivation, ed. A. Elliot and C. Dwek, 624-646. New York: Guillford Press.McQuillan, J., A.L. Greil and K.M. Shreffler 2011. Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: focusing on women who are okay either way. Maternal and Child Health Journal 15(2): 178-187.Miller, W.B. 1979. Psychosocial aspects of contraception. In Contraception: science, technology, and application, ed. National Research Council, 269-287. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Miller, W.B. 1986. Proception: an important fertility behavior. Demography 23(1): 579-594.Miller, W.B. 1994. Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: a theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychological Monographs 120(2): 223-258.Miller, W.B. 1995. Childbearing motivation and its measurement. Journal of Biosocial Science 27: 473-485.Miller, W.B. 2003. The role of nurturant schemas in human reproduction. In The biodemography of fertility, ed. J.L. Rodgers and H.-P. Kohler, 43-55. Boston: Kluwer.Miller, W.B. 2007. Fertility intentions, counterintentions, and subintentions: a theoretical framework and graphic model www.tfri.org//_TFRI.org_/TFRI_Unpublished_Work.htmlMiller, W.B. 2011. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research, and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Vol. 9:75-98.Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1993. Motivational and nonmotivational determinants of child-number desires. Population and Environment 15(2): 113-138.Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1995. Behavioral intentions: which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(6): 530-555.Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1996a. Patterns of proceptive behavior in a non-clinical sample of married couples. www.tfri.org//_TFRI.org_/TFRI_Unpublished_Work.htmlMiller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1996b. Couple disagreement: effects on the formation and implementation of fertility decisions. Personal Relationships 3: 307-336.Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1996c. The relative influence of husbands and wives on the choice and use of oral contraception, a diaphragm, and condoms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26: 1749-1774.Miller, W.B. and J.L. Rodgers 2001. The ontogeny of human bonding systems. Boston: Kluwer.Miller, W.B., D.J. and Pasta 2002. The motivational substrate of unintended and unwanted pregnancy. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 7(1): 1-29.Miller, W.B., J.S. Barber and H.H. Gatney 2011. Ambivalent fertility desires: effects on pregnancy risk in young women. Under review.Miller, W.B., L.J. Severy and D.J. Pasta 2004. A framework for modeling fertility motivation in the dyad. Population Studies 58(2): 193-205.Miller, W.B., M. Trent, and S. Chung 2011. Ambivalent childbearing motivation and condom use in young urban women. Presented at the Psychosocial Workshop, Washington, DC, 29-30 March 2011. www.tfri.org//_TFRI.org_/TFRI_Unpublished_Work.htmlPhilipov, D., O. Thévenon, J. Klobas, L. Bernardi, and A.C. Liefbroer 2009. Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO): a state of the art review. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/edrp_1_09.pdfShamay-Tsoory, S.G. 2011. Empathic processing: its cognitive and affective dimensions and neuroanatomical basis. In The social neuroscience of empathy, ed. J. Decety andVienna Institute of Demography 2010. From intentions to behavior: reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/in2b/W. Ickes, 215-232. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books. Sutton, S., D. McVey and A. Glanz 1999. A comparative test of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of condom use intentions in a national sample of English young people. Health Psychology 18(10): 72-81.