from: to:

Journal Header

Bild

DATA & TRENDS (non refereed articles): Design and implementation of an online weekly journal to study unintended pregnancies

    Jennifer S. Barber, Yasamin Kusunoki, Heather H. Gatny

Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011, pp. 327-334, 2012/02/02

doi: 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s327


PDF
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s327


Abstract

In this article we describe new research to investigate unintended pregnancies during the transition to adulthood. The Relationship Dynamics and Social Life (RDSL) study begins with a 60-minute in-person interview about family background and current relationship characteristics. At the conclusion of the interview, respondents are enrolled in an ongoing journal, which consists of a 5-minute survey via web or phone and occurs weekly for 2.5 years. We have enrolled over 1,000 young women in the study and have experienced excellent baseline response rates and high journal participation rates. Below we describe the limitations of past research on unintended pregnancy as a background for our study. Then we provide a detailed description of the study and its design strengths and weaknesses.

REFERENCES Barber, J.S., W.B. Miller and H.H. Gatny 2011. The desire to become pregnant and the desire to avoid pregnancy: ambivalence, indifference, pronatalism, and antinatalism. Paper presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, March 31-April 2, Washington, D.C.Barber, J.S., Y. Kusunoki and H.H. Gatny 2010. Design and implementation of an online weekly survey to study unintended pregnancies: preliminary results. Paper presented at the 2010 European Population Conference, September 1-4, Vienna, Austria.Festinger, L. 1959. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row-Peterson.Gatny, H.H., M.P. Couper, W.G. Axinn and J.S. Barber 2009. Using debit cards for incentive payments: experiences of a weekly survey study. Survey Practice. November 2009, http://surveypractice.org/2009/11/Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper 1998. Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley.Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler Jr., M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer and R. Tourangeau 2004. Survey methodology. New York: Wiley.Groves, R.M., P.P. Biemer, L.E. Lyberg, J.T. Massey, W.L. Nicholls and J. Waksberg, eds. 2001. Telephone survey methodology. New York: John Wiley.Halpern, C.T., J.R. Udry and C. Suchindran 1994. Effects of repeated questionnaire administration in longitudinal studies of adolescent males’ sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(1): 41-57.Jaccard, J., R. McDonald, C.K. Wan, V. Guilamo-Ramos, P.J. Dittus and S. Quinlan 2004. Recalling sexual partners: the accuracy of self-reports. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(6): 699-712.Schwarz, N. and S. Sudman, eds. 1994. Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports. New York: Springer Verlag.Searles, J.S., M.W. Perrine, J.C. Mundt and J.E. Helzer 1995. Self-report of drinking using touch-tone telephone: extending the limits of reliable daily contact. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56(4): 375-382.Sudman, S., N.M. Bradburn and N. Schwarz 1996. Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Williams, L., J. Abma and L.J. Piccinino 1999. The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: a prospective analysis. Family Planning Perspectives, 31(5): 220-227.