Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.)


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2012



ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7373-1
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7354-0
Online Edition
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2012
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2012 
2012,  154 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert
€  40,–   
Open access


Introduction
K.S. James, Vegard Skirbekk and Jan Van Bavel: Education and the global fertility transition
Refereed Articles
David Shapiro: Women’s education and fertility transition in sub-Saharan Africa
Onipede Wusu: A reassessment of the effects of female education and employment on fertility in Nigeria
Bernhard Nauck and Rokuro Tabuchi: One or two pathways to individual modernity? The effects of education on family formation among women in Japan and Germany
Albert Esteve, Jeroen Spijker, Tim Riffe and Joan García: Spousal and parental roles among female student populations in 55 low- and middle- income countries
Valeria Bordone and Daniela Weber: Number of children and cognitive abilities in later life
Jan Van Bavel: The reversal of gender inequality in education, union formation and fertility in Europe

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at

Bestellung/Order


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2012
ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7373-1
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7354-0
Online Edition



Send or fax to your local bookseller or to:

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2,
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: bestellung.verlag@oeaw.ac.at
UID-Nr.: ATU 16251605, FN 71839x Handelsgericht Wien, DVR: 0096385

Bitte senden Sie mir
Please send me
 
Exemplar(e) der genannten Publikation
copy(ies) of the publication overleaf


NAME


ADRESSE / ADDRESS


ORT / CITY


LAND / COUNTRY


ZAHLUNGSMETHODE / METHOD OF PAYMENT
    Visa     Euro / Master     American Express


NUMMER

Ablaufdatum / Expiry date:  

    I will send a cheque           Vorausrechnung / Send me a proforma invoice
 
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE

BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2012s127




Thema: journals
Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.)


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2012



ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7373-1
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7354-0
Online Edition
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2012
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2012 
2012,  154 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert
€  40,–   
Open access


Jan Van Bavel
S.  127 - 154
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2012s127

Open access

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

Abstract:
While men have always received more education than women in the past, thisgender imbalance in education has recently turned around. For the first time inEuropean history, there are now more highly educated women than men reachingthe reproductive ages and looking for a partner. I expect that this will haveprofound consequences for the demography of reproduction because matingpatterns have always implied that men are the majority in higher education. Thesetraditional practices are no longer compatible with the new gender distribution ineducation. The objective of this paper is to formulate hypotheses about theconsequences for reproductive behaviour in Europe. I expect the following causalchain between the reversal of the gender imbalance in education (RGIE) andfertility: RGIE creates a new, education-specific mating squeeze that affects theprocess and expected pattern of assortative mating, which in turns affects thetiming, probability and stability of union formation, which eventually is expectedto have implications for fertility. Each of the links in this chain are discussed indetail.

  2013/01/16 12:21:58
Object Identifier:  0xc1aa5572 0x002d68a4
.

Introduction
K.S. James, Vegard Skirbekk and Jan Van Bavel: Education and the global fertility transition
Refereed Articles
David Shapiro: Women’s education and fertility transition in sub-Saharan Africa
Onipede Wusu: A reassessment of the effects of female education and employment on fertility in Nigeria
Bernhard Nauck and Rokuro Tabuchi: One or two pathways to individual modernity? The effects of education on family formation among women in Japan and Germany
Albert Esteve, Jeroen Spijker, Tim Riffe and Joan García: Spousal and parental roles among female student populations in 55 low- and middle- income countries
Valeria Bordone and Daniela Weber: Number of children and cognitive abilities in later life
Jan Van Bavel: The reversal of gender inequality in education, union formation and fertility in Europe

REFERENCES
Amato, P.R. 2000. The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(4): 1269-1287

Amato, P.R. 2010. Research on divorce: continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(3): 650-666

Amato, P.R. and S. James. 2010. Divorce in Europe and the United States: commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science 1(1): 2-13

Angrist, J.D. 2002. How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America´s second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3): 997-1038

Bauer, G. and M. Jacob. 2009. The Influence of Partners Education on Family Formation. Mannheim: University of Mannheim. (Equalsoc working paper 2009(4))

Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2011. The marriage route to migration: of border artists, transnational matchmaking and imported spouses. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 1(2): 60-68

Beller, E. 2009. Bringing intergenerational social mobility research into the twenty-first century: why mothers matter. American Sociological Review 74(4): 507-528

Billari, F.C. and H.-P. Kohler. 2004. Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies 58(2): 161-176

Blossfeld, H.-P. 2009. Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 513-530

Blossfeld, H.-P. and A. Timm. 2003. Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Blossfeld, H.-P. and S. Drobnic, eds. 2001. Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society. From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bradley, Karen. 2000. The incorporation of women into higher education: paradoxical outcomes? Sociology of Education 73(1): 1-18

Brown, C. and M. Corcoran. 1997. Sex-based differences in school content and the Male-Female Wage Gap. Journal of Labor Economics 15(3): 431-465

Buchmann, C. and T. A. DiPrete. 2006. The growing female advantage in college completion: the role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review 71(4): 515-541

Buchmann, C., T.A. DiPrete and A. McDaniel. 2008. Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 319-337

Celikaksoy, A., H. Nielsen and M. Verner. 2006. Marriage migration: just another case of positive assortative mating? Review of Economics of the Household 4(3): 253-275

Charles, M. and K. Bradley. 2002. Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review 67(4): 573-599

Cohen, J.E. 2008. Make secondary education universal. Nature 456: 572-573

Cooke, L.P. 2004. The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1246-1259

Cooke, L.P. 2009. Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy 38(1): 123-140

Corijn, M., A.C. Liefbroer and J. de Jong Gierveld. 1996. It takes two to tango, doesn´t it? The influence of couple characteristics on the timing of the birth of the first child. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(1): 117-126

Crowder, K.D. and S.E. Tolnay. 2000. A new marriage squeeze for black women: the role of racial intermarriage by black men. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(3): 792-807

Dewilde, C. and W. Uunk. 2008. Remarriage as a Way to Overcome the Financial Consequences of Divorce. European Sociological Review 24(3): 393-407

DiPrete, T.A. and C. Buchmann. 2006. Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography 43(1): 1-24

Dykstra, P. and A.-R. Poortman. 2010. Economic resources and remaining single: trends over time. European Sociological Review 26(3): 277-290

Esteve, A., J. Garcia and I. Permanyer. 2011. The reversal of the gender gap in eduation and its impact on union formation: the end of hypergamy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America 2011

European Commission. 2009. Women in Science. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

European Commission. 2010. Report on Equality Between Women and Men. Luxembourg: European Union

Gibson-Davis, C.M. 2009. Money, marriage, and children: testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 146-160

Goldman, N. and M. Montgomery. 1989. Fecundability and husbands age. Social Biology 36(3-4): 146-166

Goldstein, J.R. and C.T. Kenney. 2001. Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66(4): 506-519

Guttentag, M. and P.F. Secord. 1983. Too many women? The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

Harknett, K. 2008. Mate availability and unmarried parent relationships. Demography 45(3): 555-571

Howarth, J. 1994. Chapter 13. Women. In The History of the University of Oxford: The Twentieth Century, ed. B. Harrison, 345-376. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Huber, S. and M. Fieder. 2011. Educational homogamy lowers the odds of reproductive failure. PLoS 6(7): 1-6

Huijts, T., C.W. Monden and G. Kraaykamp. 2010. Education, educational heterogamy, and self-assessed health in Europe. European Sociological Review 26(3): 261-276

Härkönen, J. and J. Dronkers. 2006. Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce. A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review 22(5): 501-517

Isen, A. and B. Stevenson. 2010. Womens Education and Family Behavior: Trends in Marriage, Divorce and Fertility. In Demography and the Economy, ed. J.B. Shoven. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Jalovaara, M. 2012. Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born 1969-81. Population Studies 66(1): 69-85

Jurajda, S. 2003. Gender wage gap and segregation in enterprises and the public sector in late transition countries. Journal of Comparative Economics 31(2): 199-222

KC, S., B. Barakat, A. Goujon, V. Skirbekk, W. Sanderson and W. Lutz. 2010. Projection of populations by level of educational attainment, age, and sex for 120 countries for 2005-2050. Demographic Research 22(15): 383-472

Kalmijn, M. 1991(a). Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy. American Sociological Review 56(6): 786-800

Kalmijn, M. 1991(b). Status Homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 97(2): 496-523

Kalmijn, M. 1993. Spouse selection among the children of European immigrants: a comparison of marriage cohorts in the 1960 census. International Migration Review 27(1): 51-78

Kalmijn, M. 1998. Intermarriage and homogamy. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395- 421

Kalmijn, M. 2007. Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990-2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243-263

Kofman, E. 2004. Family-related migration: a critical review of European studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30(2): 243-262

Kravdal, Ø. 1999. Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation. Population Studies 53(1): 63-80

Kravdal, Ø. and R.R. Rindfuss. 2008. Changing relationships between education and fertility a study of women and men born 1940-64. American Sociological Review 73(5): 854-873

Köppen, K. 2006. Second births in western Germany and France. Demographic Research 14(14): 295-330

Lichter, D.T., F.B. LeClere and D.K. McLaughlin. 1992. Local marriage markets and the marital behavior of black and white women. American Journal of Sociology 96(4): 843-867

Lievens, J. 1999. Family-forming migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: the demand for marriage partners from the countries of origin. International Migration Review 33(3): 717-744

Lutz, W., A. Goujon and G. Doblhammer-Reiter. 1998. Demographic dimensions in forecasting: adding education to age and sex. Population and Development Review 24(Supplement): 42-58

Lutz, W., A. Goujon, S. K.C. and W. Sanderson. 2007. Reconstruction of population by age, sex and level of educational attainment of 120 countries for 1970-2000. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007(5): 193-235

Lutz, W., J.C. Cuaresma and W. Sanderson. 2008. The demography of educational attainment and economic growth. Science 319(5866): 1047-1048

Machin, S. and P.A. Puhani. 2003. Subject of degree and the gender wage differential: evidence from the UK and Germany. Economics Letters 79(3): 393-400

Mandel, H. and M. Semyonov. 2006. A welfare state paradox: state interventions and womens employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology 111(6): 1910-1949

Mare, R.D. 1991. Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review 56(1): 15-32

Mascie-Taylor, C.G.N. 1986. Assortative mating and differential fertility. Biology and Society 3(4): 167-70

Matorras, R., F. Matorras, A. Exposito, L. Martinez and L. Crisol. 2011. Decline in human fertility rates with male age: a consequence of a decrease in male fecundity with aging? Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 71(4): 229-235

McDaniel, A. 2010. The Gender Gap in Higher Education in Europe: the Impact of Individual and National Characteristics. Ohio State Univ., unpubl. working paper

McDonald, P. 2000. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427-439

McLanahan, S. 2004. Diverging destinies: how children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4): 607-627

Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler and F.C. Billari. 2011. High Development and Fertility: Fertility at Older Reproductive Ages and Gender Equality Explain the Positive Link. Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. (MPIDR Working Paper WP 2011-017.)

Myrskylä, M., H.-P. Kohler, and F.C. Billari. 2009. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460(6 August): 741-743

Oppenheimer, V.K. 1988. A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563-591

Rindfuss, R.R. and A. VandenHeuvel. 1990 . Cohabitation: a precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single. Population and Development Review 16(4): 703-726

Rose, E. 2004. Education and Hypergamy in Marriage Markets. Washington, WA: Center for Research on Families, University of Washington. (Center for Research on Families Working Paper 2004-01.)

Rosina, A. and M.R. Testa. 2009. Couples first child intentions and disagreement: an analysis of the Italian case. European Journal of Population 25(4): 487-502

Schoen, R. 1983. Measuring the tightness of the marriage squeeze. Demography 20(1): 61-78

Schofer, E. and J.W. Meyer. 2005. The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review 70(6): 898-920

Schwartz, C.R. and R.D. Mare. 2005. Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42(4): 621-646

Shafer, K.M. 2009. Gender Differences in Remarriage: Marriage Formation and Assortative Mating After Divorce. PhD diss., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Ohio

Sobotka, T and L. Toulemon. 2008. Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85-138

Sobotka, T. 2004. Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review 30(2): 195-220

Soons, J.P.M., A.C. Liefbroer and M. Kalmijn. 2009. The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1254-1270

South, S.J., K. Trent and Y. Shen. 2001. Changing partners: towards a macrostructuralopportunity theory of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family 63(3): 743-754

Sweeney, M.M. and M. Cancian. 2004. The changing importance of white womans economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 1015-1028

Teachman, J.D. 2002. Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors Demography 39(2): 331-351

Thomson, E. 1990. Two in one: structural models of couple behaviour. In Family Variables: Conceptualization, Measurement and Use, ed. C.W. Draper and A.C. Marcos, 129-142. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Thomson, E. 2001. Family size preferences. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 5347-5350. Amsterdam: Elsevier

Thomson, E., E. McDonald, and L. Bumpass. 1990. Fertility desires and fertility. Demography 27(4): 579-588

Timmerman, C. 2008. Marriage in a culture of migration. Emirdag marrying into Flanders. European Review 16(4): 585-594

Torr, B.M. and S.E. Short. 2004. Second births and the second shift: a research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review 30(1): 109-130

Van Bavel, J. 2010. Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: the impact of expected earnings, gender composition and family attitudes, Demography 47(2): 439-458

Van Bavel, J. and J. Rozanska-Putek. 2010. Second birth rates across Europe: childcare as a mediator of the effect of womens level of education. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2010(8): 107-138

Van Bavel, J., M. Jansen and B. Wijckmans. 2012. Has divorce become a pro-natal force in Europe at the turn of the 21st century? Population Research and Policy Review

Van de Putte, B., F. van Poppel, S. Vanassche et al.. 2009. The rise of age homogamy in 19th century Western Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1234-1253

Vincent-Lancrin, S. 2008. The Reversal of Gender Inequalities in Higher Education: an Ongoing Trend. In Higher Education to 2030: Demography, 265-98. Paris: OECD

Voas, D. 2004. Conflicting preferences: a reason fertility tends to be too high or too low Population and Development Review 29(4): 627-646

West, C. and D. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125-151

Wilson, K.L. and J.P. Boldizar. 1990. Gender segregation in higher education: effects of aspirations, mathematics achievement, and income. Sociology of Education 63(1): 62-74

de Graaf, P.M. and M. Kalmijn. 2003. Alternative routes in the remarriage market: competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce. Social Forces 81(4): 1459- 1496



Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at