Bild

Wann muss der Herrscher schweigen? Zur Behandlung königlicher Machtsprüche in der Preußischen Rechtsreform

    Milan Kuhli

Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2 / 2013, pp. 456-464, 2014/01/30

recht [durch] setzen - Making Things Legal.
Gesetzgebung und prozessuale Wirklichkeit in den europäischen Rechtstraditionen

doi: 10.1553/BRGOE2013-2s456

€  59,00 

incl. VAT

PDF
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

doi:10.1553/BRGOE2013-2s456


Abstract

The present paper shall provide an analysis of the discourse regarding Machtsprüche (‘dictums’) in the elaboration of the codification of the Prussian private law – the “Allgemeines Landrecht für die Preußischen Staaten” – towards the end of the 18th century. A Machtspruch consisted of an authoritative decision by the monarch through which he could intervene in on-going judicial proceedings in civil law matters either by giving a ruling himself or by instructing the court to come to a certain decision. In Prussia the question arose of whether Machtsprüche should be forbidden by law. The paper will reflect the positions of King Frederick II., King Frederick William II., high-ranking Prussian civil servants, and legal reformists in this discourse. It will show that the discourse concerning this question is in a way a continuation of the dichotomy between power on the one hand and law on the other, that was typical of Enlightened Absolutism.