![]() |
![]() |
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2 / 2013recht [durch] setzen - Making Things Legal.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Virginia AMOROSI (Neapel)
Migration, Labour and Legal Discourse in the early 20th Century
A French-Italian Example in the Making of International Labour Law …
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
![]() |
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2 / 2013, pp. 553-560, 2014/01/30
recht [durch] setzen - Making Things Legal.
Gesetzgebung und prozessuale Wirklichkeit in den europäischen Rechtstraditionen
The edicts constituted the most distinguished form of prefectural legal settlements in Egypt. They usually followed the same scheme, which is evident from the edict of Titus Honoratus, published as P. Oxy. XXXIV, 2704. This edict prescribes measures against persons who allow livestock to graze on someone else’s field, thereby damaging the crops. The standard edict contains the prescript, followed by the main body of the edict. The date would be stated at the end and it followed the Egyptian calendar. The regulations contained in the exemplary edict are slightly illustrated by two papyri – P. Cair. Isid. 78 and P. Mert. II, 92 which, in particular, sheds light on the provisions governing the penalty contained in the edict. It is still not entirely clear to what situation the edict refers but an analysis of the language used in it and in other documents indicates that it applied to the situation where the humans, rather than the animals, were responsible for damages.