![]() |
Wiener Studien Band 129/2016Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie, Patristik und lateinische Tradition
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|

Wiener Studien 129/2016, pp. 63-70, 2016/08/05
Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie, Patristik und lateinische Tradition
This paper discusses an incoherence in the strophe of the second stasimon of Euripides’ Ion: against the general gist of the song and the entire play, Ion seems to be accused of having planned to intrude into Creusa’s family by employing an untruthful oracle. That sense, however, is only produced by a number of conjectures. If the interference with the transmission is reduced, the train of thought becomes coherent again: the strophe then deals with Ion’s integration into existing social structures.