![]() |
![]() |
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 6. Jahrgang Band 2 / 2016
Gerichtsvielfalt in Wien
|
![]() |
![]() |
István FAZEKAS, Budapest …
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
![]() |
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2 / 2016, pp. 345-378, 2016/10/11
Gerichtsvielfalt in Wien
Forschungen zum modernen Gerichtsbegriff
Tezner’s plea against the misunderstanding of absolutistic reforms, as in the context of the rule of law, demonstrates continuities regarding administrative jurisdiction in the history of courts in Austria. The organisational principle of extending benches of judges by including judicial councillors survived all Josephinian reforms. Judicial councillors represented the sovereign’s interests. Studying the decisions of the Supreme Justice Office (Oberste Justizstelle), Tezner found that it provided rather generously for these interests.
Keywords: Administrative Jurisdiction - TEZNER, Friedrich