![]() |
Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft158. Jg. (Jahresband), Wien 2016
|
|
epub.oeaw – Institutionelles Repositorium der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften epub.oeaw – Institutional Repository of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 http://epub.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: epub@oeaw.ac.at |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|

Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft Band 158/2016, pp. 289-308, 2019/05/27
158. Jg. (Jahresband), Wien 2016
The United States and China have national geography standards that identify the knowledge, concepts, principles, and skills that students should know and be able to use. This paper compares the geography standards of these two countries, specifically the standards for the middle school using content analysis and concept mapping as the methodological technique. The findings suggest that although there are a number of similarities between both country’s documents, there are also significant differences, which are worth pointing out.
Keywords: geography standards, comparison, United States (U.S.), China, concept mapping