![]() |
Wiener Studien Band 135/2022Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie, Patristik und lateinische Tradition
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|

Wiener Studien 135/2022, pp. 87-118, 2022/07/29
Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie, Patristik und lateinische Tradition
In the first chapter and in the appendix, I question the conventional thesis that acollection compiled by Porphyrios was the source Ausonius made use of for his Epitaphia. Inthe main part, I present some examples to illustrate two types of text-relations that are constitutivefor the opusculum: first the relationship between the model and the text, the so-called intertextuality(epit. 1–3), then – looking at epit. 6, 5, 13 – interrelations among the epitaphs themselveswhich I name intratextuality. The correlations help to network the diverse individual portraitsand to give coherence to the cycle.