Bild

Drei textkritische Probleme in der ersten Ekloge des Calpurnius

    Heiko Ullrich

Wiener Studien 136/2023, pp. 147-159, 2023/07/11

Zeitschrift für Klassische Philologie, Patristik und lateinische Tradition

doi: 10.1553/wst136s147

doi: 10.1553/wst136s147

PDF
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

doi:10.1553/wst136s147



doi:10.1553/wst136s147

Abstract

In this paper I will discuss three passages in Calpurnius Siculusʼ first Eclogue whose text is disputed: In Calp. ecl. 1,35 Jan van Vlietʼs conjecture fatis has nearly erased the transmitted fagis from both editorsʼ and interpretersʼ memory, in 1,57 a simple scribeʼs error has led to otherwise unsubstantiable guesses about a substantive *discordium, and in 1,76 the splitted transmission which has both fervit and servit can be decided in favour of the latter by a closer look at the context.