This article focuses on some questions that fundamentally shape the revival of ancient double-pipes. These surround the choice of material used for reed-making, interrogating what ancient Greek sources, specifically Theophrastus, report in this regard. These testimonies are interpreted through the lens of our own experience as reed makers and performers of ancient doublepipes, comparing the results obtained from culms of different species, growing locations, and harvesting times. Issues that negatively influence the research aiming to develop reliable reconstructions of ancient reeds are discussed. These include ad hoc gathering of data, less than rigorous analysis, and knowledge silos prone to bias. This leads the authors to propose a method of cataloguing culm harvests and manufactured reeds that uses accessible technology to facilitate collaboration and build stronger data with an open science ethos.