![]() |
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2026Special issue: Delayed reproduction
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|

Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2026, pp. , 2026/04/22
Special issue: Delayed reproduction
China’s fertility transition produced two distinct demographic pathways to smaller families: one driven by delayed childbearing, and the other by direct limits on family size. Using data from the 2011–2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, we examine cohorts whose reproductive years unfolded under successive fertility policy regimes, from pre-policy to one-child policy periods. Kitagawa decomposition shows that delayed first births account for 22% of urban–rural differences but only 10% of educational differences in completed fertility, indicating that urban and rural populations reached similarly small families through different mechanisms. These timing patterns have enduring consequences: when today’s older adults reach age 80, the children of urban and highly educated parents are 2–3 years younger than those of rural and less educated parents, with delayed first birth explaining over half of the educational gap in eldercare timing. The findings reveal a previously overlooked dimension of inequality: namely, that as China ages, differences in first birth timing have created disparities in who has children available to provide care, and when.
Keywords: Delayed fertility; Socioeconomic gradient; Urban–rural divide; China; Population ageing