![]() |
Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, Band 59 (2022‒2025)Vienna Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 59 (2022‒2025)
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|

Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, Band 59 (2022‒2025), pp. 139-148, 2026/04/28
Vienna Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 59 (2022‒2025)
This paper claims that the two seemingly different formulations of Dhar-makīrti’s definition of a valid cognition in Pramāṇavārttika, Pramāṇasiddhi chapter vv. 1 and 5 have been ingeniously misinterpreted by his direct student Devendrabuddhi and later followers, Indian and Tibetan, as well as by modern scholars. It clarifies that Dharmakīrti actually provides only a single definition and, with reference to his state-ments on perception in the context of non-perception, explains what he intended with its formulation by means of two separate statements.
Keywords: Dharmakīrti, Pramāṇavārttika, Hetubindu, pramāṇa, anupalabdhi, kartṛsthakriyā, karmasthakriyā, prakāśa