Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.)


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011



ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9
Online Edition
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011 
2012,  344 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert
€  50,–   
Open access


Introduction
Maria Rita Testa, Tomás Sobotka and Philip S. Morgan: Reproductive decision-making: towards improved theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches.
Demographic Debate
S. Philip Morgan and Christine A. Bachrach: Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility?
Warren B. Miller: Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework
Jennifer Barber: The Theory of Planned Behaviour: considering drives, proximity and dynamics
Dimiter Philipov: Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer's perspective
Jane Klobas: The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions
Aart C. Liefbroer: On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility research
Icek Ajzen: Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach's critique
Christine A. Bachrach and S. Philip Morgan: Further reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and fertility research
Refereed Articles
Warren B. Miller: Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy
Máire Ní Bhrolcháin and Éva Beaujouan: Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007
Saskia Hin, Anne Gauthier, Joshua Goldstein and Christoph Bühler: Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us
Maria Rita Testa, Laura Cavalli and Alessandro Rosina: Couple´s childbearing behaviour in Italy: which of the partners is leading it?
Nicoletta Balbo and Melinda Mills: The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions
Markus Kotte and Volker Ludwig: Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: the role of contagion
David De Wachter and Karel Neels: Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s
Clémentine Rossier, Sara Brachet and Anne Salles: Family policies, norms about gender roles and fertility decisions in France and Germany
Anna Rotkirch, Stuart Basten, Heini Väisänen and Markus Jokela: Baby longing and men's reproductive motivation
Anna Baranowska and Anna Matysiak: Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence for Poland
Data and Trends (non-refereed contributions)
Jennifer S. Barber, Yasamin Kusunoki and Heather Gatny : Design and implementation of an online weekly survey to study unintended pregnancies
Beatrice Chromková Manea and Petr Fucík: Couples disagreement about fertility preferences and family-friendly policy measures in the Czech Republic

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3402-3406, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at

Bestellung/Order


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011
ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9
Online Edition



Send or fax to your local bookseller or to:

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2,
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3402-3406, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: bestellung.verlag@oeaw.ac.at
UID-Nr.: ATU 16251605, FN 71839x Handelsgericht Wien, DVR: 0096385

Bitte senden Sie mir
Please send me
 
Exemplar(e) der genannten Publikation
copy(ies) of the publication overleaf


NAME


ADRESSE / ADDRESS


ORT / CITY


LAND / COUNTRY


ZAHLUNGSMETHODE / METHOD OF PAYMENT
    Visa     Euro / Master     American Express


NUMMER

Ablaufdatum / Expiry date:                      

    I will send a cheque           Vorausrechnung / Send me a proforma invoice
 
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE

BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code
Permanent QR-Code of DOI
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s99



Thema: journals
Vienna Institute of Demography (Ed.)


Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011



ISSN 1728-4414
Print Edition
ISSN 1728-5305
Online Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7235-2
Print Edition
ISBN 978-3-7001-7252-9
Online Edition
Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2011 
2012,  344 Seiten, 24x17cm, broschiert
€  50,–   
Open access

Máire Ní Bhrolcháin, Éva Beaujouan
PDF Icon  Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979-2007 ()
S.  99 - 129
doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s99

Open access
Abstract:
The paper uses a time series of repeated rounds of the General Household Survey in Great Britain to study uncertainty in fertility intentions. We show that a substantial minority of women are uncertain in their expectations about future childbearing. A comparison of reported uncertainty in GHS rounds 1979-1990 with 1991-2007 reveals that the estimated level of uncertainty is influenced by question format. At the individual level, uncertainty varies largely with demographic status and life stage-age, partnership status, parity and time since previous birth. Evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies, particularly in relation to pregnancy intentions, reinforces the reality of uncertainty about reproductive prospects. We suggest that the measurement of fertility intentions needs improvement. A new theoretical approach to fertility intentions is outlined in brief.

Published Online:  2012/02/02 15:16:22
Object Identifier:  0xc1aa5576 0x002a70f6

Introduction
Maria Rita Testa, Tomás Sobotka and Philip S. Morgan: Reproductive decision-making: towards improved theoretical, methodological and empirical approaches.
Demographic Debate
S. Philip Morgan and Christine A. Bachrach: Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility?
Warren B. Miller: Comparing the TPB and the T-D-I-B framework
Jennifer Barber: The Theory of Planned Behaviour: considering drives, proximity and dynamics
Dimiter Philipov: Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer's perspective
Jane Klobas: The Theory of Planned Behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions
Aart C. Liefbroer: On the usefulness of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for fertility research
Icek Ajzen: Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach's critique
Christine A. Bachrach and S. Philip Morgan: Further reflections on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and fertility research
Refereed Articles
Warren B. Miller: Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy
Máire Ní Bhrolcháin and Éva Beaujouan: Uncertainty in fertility intentions in Britain, 1979–2007
Saskia Hin, Anne Gauthier, Joshua Goldstein and Christoph Bühler: Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us
Maria Rita Testa, Laura Cavalli and Alessandro Rosina: Couple´s childbearing behaviour in Italy: which of the partners is leading it?
Nicoletta Balbo and Melinda Mills: The influence of the family network on the realisation of fertility intentions
Markus Kotte and Volker Ludwig: Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: the role of contagion
David De Wachter and Karel Neels: Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s
Clémentine Rossier, Sara Brachet and Anne Salles: Family policies, norms about gender roles and fertility decisions in France and Germany
Anna Rotkirch, Stuart Basten, Heini Väisänen and Markus Jokela: Baby longing and men's reproductive motivation
Anna Baranowska and Anna Matysiak: Does parenthood increase happiness? Evidence for Poland
Data and Trends (non-refereed contributions)
Jennifer S. Barber, Yasamin Kusunoki and Heather Gatny : Design and implementation of an online weekly survey to study unintended pregnancies
Beatrice Chromková Manea and Petr Fucík: Couples disagreement about fertility preferences and family-friendly policy measures in the Czech Republic

REFERENCES
Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211.

Ali, R., J. Greer, D. Matthews, L. Murray, S. Robinson and G. Sattar 2008. General household survey 2006. London: Office for National Statistics. Available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/product.asp?vlnk=5756, accessed August 2010.

Bachrach, C.A. and S. Newcomer 1999. Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: Distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum? Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 251-252.

Barber, J.S., W.B. Miller and H.H. Gatney 2010. The desire to become pregnant and the desire to avoid pregnancy: ambivalence, indifference, pronatalism, and antinatalism. Presented at the international conference “From Intentions to Behaviour: Reproductive Decision-Making in a Macro-Micro Perspective”, Vienna, December 2010.

Barrett, G. and K. Wellings 2002. What is a “planned” pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Social Science and Medicine 55(4): 545-557.

Barrett, G., S.C. Smith and K. Wellings 2004. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 58(5): 426-433.

Barton, J. 2001. Developing a weighting and grossing system for the general household surveys in the United Kingdom. Survey Methododology Bulletin 49: 15-26.

Beaujouan, É., J.J. Brown and M. Ní Bhrolcháin 2011. Reweighting the General Household Survey 1979-2007. Population Trends 145: 119-145.

Becker, G.S. 1981. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Berent, J. 1983. Family size preferences in Europe and USA: Ultimate expected number of children. WFS Comparative Studies 26.

Berrington, A. 2004. Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends 117: 9-19.

Blake, J. 1966. Ideal family size among white americans: A quarter of a century's evidence. Demography 3(1): 154-173.

Bongaarts, J. 2002. The end of the fertility transition in the developed world. Population and Development Review 28(3): 419-443.

Bumpass, L. and C.F. Westoff 1969. The prediction of completed fertility. Demography 6(4): 445-454.

Burden, B.C. 1997. Deterministic and probabilistic voting models. American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1150-1169.

Cartwright, A. 1976. How many children? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Cartwright, A. 1988. Unintended pregnancies that lead to babies. Social Science and Medicine 27(3): 249-254.

Cartwright, A. and W. Wilkins 1976. Changes in family building plans: a follow up study to “How many children?”. Studies on Medical and Population Subjects,OPCS 33.

Coombs, L.C. 1974. Measurement of family-size preferences and subsequent fertility. Demography 11(4): 587-611.

Delavande, A. 2008. Measuring revisions to subjective expectations. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36(1): 43-82.

Dunnell, K. 1979. Family formation 1976. London: H.M.S.O.

Esacove, A. 2008. Making sense of sex: rethinking intentionality. Culture Health & Sexuality 10(4): 377-390.

Freedman, R., D.S. Freedman and A.D. Thornton 1980. Changes in fertility expectations and preferences between 1962 and 1977 - their relation to final parity. Demography 17(4): 365-378.

Freedman, R., P. Whelpton and A. Campbell 1959. Family planning, sterility and population growth. New York: McGraw Hill.

Goldstein, J., W. Lutz and M.R. Testa 2003. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 479-496.

Greil, A.L. and J. McQuillan 2010. "Trying" times: Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 24(2): 137-156.

Hagewen, K.J. and S.P. Morgan 2005. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002. Population and Development Review 31(3): 507-527.

Hauser, P.M. 1967. Review: 'Family planning and population programs': a book review article. Demography 4(1): 397-414.

Hayford, S.R. and S.P. Morgan 2008. Religiosity and fertility in the United States: the role of fertility intentions. Social Forces 86(3): 1163-1188.

Heckhausen, J. and R. Schulz 1995. A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review 102(2): 284-304.

Hendershot and P.J. Placek, 51-59. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Johnson-Hanks, J. 2005. When the future decides - uncertainty and intentional action in contemporary Cameroon. Current Anthropology 46(3): 363-385.

Johnson-Hanks, J., C. Bachrach, S.P. Morgan and H.-P. Kohler 2011. Understanding family change and variation: toward a theory of conjunctural action. New York: Springer.

Joyce, T., R. Kaestner and S. Korenman 2000. The stability of pregnancy intentions and pregnancy-related maternal behaviors. Maternal and Child Health Journal 4(3): 171-178.

Kaufmann, R., L. Morris and A.M. Spitz 1997. Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions. American Journal of Epidemiology 145(9): 810-816.

Kavanaugh, M.L. and E.B. Schwarz 2009. Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single versus a multi-item measure. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 41(4): 238-243.

Kendall, C., A. Afable-Munsuz, I. Speizer, A. Averya, N. Schmidt and J. Santelli 2005.

Kiser, C.V. 1967. Review: the growth of American families studies: an assessment of significance. Demography 4(1): 388-396.

Kneale, D. and H. Joshi 2008. Postponement and childlessness: evidence from two British cohorts. Demographic Research 19: 1935-1968.

Krosnick, J.A. 1999. Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 537-567. Lee, R.D. 1980. Aiming at a moving target: period fertility and changing reproductive goals. Population Studies 30(2): 205-226.

Lee, R.D. 1981. A model for forecasting fertility from birth-expectations data. In Predicting fertility. Demographic studies of birth expectations, ed. G.E. Hendershot and P.J. Placek, 75-99. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Lewis-Faning, E. 1949. Papers of the Royal Commission on Population Volume 1. Report on an enquiry into family limitation and its influence on human fertility during the past fifty years. London: H.M.S.O.

Lichtenstein, S. and P. Slovic, eds. 2006. The construction of preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liefbroer, A.C. 2009. Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: a lifecourse perspective. European Journal of Population 25(4): 363-386.

Luker, K.C. 1999. A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 248-249.

Manski, C.F. 2004. Measuring expectations. Econometrica 72(5): 1329-1376.

McQuillan, J., A.L. Greil and K.M. Shreffler 2010. Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: focusing on women who are okay either way. Maternal and Child Health Journal 15(2): 178-187.

Miller, W.B. and D.J. Pasta 1995. Behavioral intentions - which ones predict fertility behavior in married-couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(6): 530-555.

Miller, W.B., L.J. Severy and D.J. Pasta 2004. A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies 58(2): 193-205.

Monnier, A. 1989. Fertility intentions and actual behaviour. a longitudinal study: 1974, 1979. Population 44(1): 237-259.

Moos, M.-K., R. Petersen, K. Meadows, C.L. Melvin and A.M. Spitz 1997. Pregnant women's perspectives on intendedness of pregnancy. Women's Health Issues 7(6): 385-392.

Morgan, S.P. 1981. Intention and uncertainty at later stages of childbearing: the United States 1965 and 1970. Demography 18(3): 267-285.

Morgan, S.P. 1982. Parity-specific fertility intentions and uncertainty -the United States, 1970 to 1976. Demography 19(3): 315-334.

Morgan, S.P. 1985. Individual and couple intentions for more children - a research note. Demography 22(1): 125-132.

Morgan, S.P. 2001. Should fertility intentions inform fertility forecasts?, The direction of fertility in the United States, Alexandria, Virginia 2001. Washington, D.C.: US Census Bureau.

Morgan, S.P. and C.A. Bachrach 2011. Is the Theory of Planned Behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Vol 9:11-18.

Morgan, S.P. and H. Rackin 2010. The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 36(1): 91-118.

Morgan, S.P. and R. Chen 1992. Predicting childlessness for recent cohorts of American women. International Journal of Forecasting 8(3): 477-493.

Murphy, M. 2009. Where have all the children gone? Women's reports of more childlessness at older ages than when they were younger in a large-scale continuous household survey in Britain. Population Studies 63(2): 115-133.

Noack, T. and L. Ostby 1985. Fertility expectations: a short cut or dead-end in predicting fertility? Scandinavian Population Studies 7: 48-59.

Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and É. Beaujouan (forthcoming). How real are reproductive goals?

Ní Bhrolcháin, M., É. Beaujouan and A. Berrington 2010. Stability and change in fertility intentions in Britain, 1991-2007. Population Trends 141: 1-23.

Ní Bhrolcháin, M., É. Beaujouan and M. Murphy 2011. Sources of error in reported childlessness in a continuous British household survey. Population Studies 65: 305-318.

Oakley, D. 1981. Reflections on the development of measures of childbearing expectations. In Predicting fertility. Demographic studies of birth JG.E. Hendershot and P.J. Placek, 11-26. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Philipov, D. 2009. The effect of competing intentions and behaviour on short-term childbearing intentions and subsequent childbearing. European Journal of Population 25(4): 525-548.

Poole, V.L., J.S. Flowers, R.L. Goldenberg, S.P. Cliver and S. McNeal 2000. Changes in intendedness during pregnancy in a high-risk multiparous population. Maternal and Child Health Journal 4(3): 179-182.

Quesnel-Vallée, A. and S.P. Morgan 2003. Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the US. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 497-525.

Rindfuss, R.R., S.P. Morgan and G. Swicegood 1988. First births in America. London: University of California Press.

Sable, M.R. and M.K. Libbus 2000. Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: are they different? Maternal and Child Health Journal 191-196.

Santelli, J., R. Rochat, K. Hatfield-Timajchy, B.C. Gilbert, K. Curtis, R. Cabral, J.S. Hirsch, L. Schieve and Unintended Pregnancy Working Group 2003. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 35(2): 94-101.

Santelli, J.S., L.D. Lindberg, M.G. Orr, L.B. Finer and I. Speizer 2009. Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Studies in Family Planning 40(2): 87-100.

Sautory, O. 1993. La macro calmar: redressement d’un échantillon par calage sur marge. Documents de travail de la direction des statistiques démographiques et sociales F9310. www.insee.fr/fr/methodes/default.asp?page=outils/calmar/accueil_calmar.htm

Schaeffer, N.C. and E. Thomson 1992. The discovery of grounded uncertainty: developing standardized questions about strength of fertility motivation. Sociological Methodology 22: 37- 82.

Schoen, R., N.M. Astone, Y.J. Kim, C.A. Nathanson and J.M. Fields 1999. Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior?. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61(3): 790-799.

Schwartz, A., N. Peacock, K. McRae, R. Seymour and M. Gilliam 2010. Defining new categories of pregnancy intention in African-American women. Womens Health Issues 20(6): 371-379.

Schwarz, E.B., P.A. Lohr, M.A. Gold and B. Gerbert 2007. Prevalence and correlates of ambivalence towards pregnancy among nonpregnant women. Contraception 75(4): 305-310.

Smallwood, S. and J. Jefferies 2003. Family building intentions in England and Wales: trends, outcomes and interpretations. Population Trends 112: 15-28.

Sobotka, T. 2009. Sub-replacement fertility intentions in Austria. European Journal of Population 25(4): 387-412.

Sobotka, T. and M.R. Testa 2008. Attitudes and intentions toward childlessness in Europe. In People, Population Change and Policies, ed. C. Hohn, D. Avramov and I. Kotowska, 177-211. Springer.

Spéder, Z. and B. Kapitány 2009. How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population 25(4): 503-523.

Stanford, J.B., R. Hobbs, P. Jameson, M.J. DeWitt and R.C. Fischer 2000. Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Maternal and Child Health Journal 4(3): 183-189.

Stevens-Simon, C., J. Sheeder, R. Beach and S. Harter 2005. Adolescent pregnancy: do expectations affect intentions?. Journal of Adolescent Health 37: 243.e215-243.e222.

Testa, M.R. 2007. Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Vol. 5: 357-379.

Testa, M.R. and L. Toulemon 2006. Family formation in France: individual preferences and subsequent outcomes. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research Vol.4: 41-75.

Thomson, E. 1997. Couple childbearing desires, intentions and births. Demography 34(3): 343-354.

Thomson, E. and J.M. Hoem 1998. Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography 35(3): 315-322.

Thomson, E. and Y. Brandreth 1995. Measuring fertility demand. Demography 32(1): 81-96.

Toulemon, L. and M.R. Testa 2005. Fertility intentions and actual fertility: A complex relationship. Population and Societies 415.

Trussell, J., B. Vaughan and J. Stanford 1999. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National survey of family growth. Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 246-247, 260.

Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans - results of qualitative research. Social Science and Medicine 60: 297-311.

Van Hoorn, W. and N. Keilman 1997. Birth expectations and their use in fertility forecasting. Eurostat, Eurostat Working Papers (Population and social condidtions) E4/1997-4.

Vignoli, D. and A. Régnier-Loilier 2010. Fertility dynamics in France and Italy. Who are the couples that do not give birth to the intended child? Università degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica “G. Parenti” Working Paper 2010/07.

Westoff, C.F. 1981. The validity of birth intentions: evidence from U.S. longitudinal studies. In Predicting fertility. Demographic studies of birth expectations, ed. G.E.

Westoff, C.F. and N.B. Ryder 1977. The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography 14(4): 431-453.

Westoff, C.F., E.G. Mishler and E.L. Kelly 1957. Preferences in size of family and eventual fertility twenty years after. The American Journal of Sociology 62(5): 491-497.

Westoff, C.F., R.G. Potter, P.C. Sagi and E.G. Mishler 1961. Family growth in Metropolitan America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Whelpton, P., A. Campbell and J. Paterson 1966. Fertility and family planning in the United States. Princeton University Press.

Woolf, M. and S. Pegden 1976. Families five years on. London: HMSO.

Zabin, L.S. 1999. Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use - and pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives 31(5): 250-251.

Zabin, L.S., G.R. Huggins, M.R. Emerson and V.E. Cullins. 2000. Partner effects on a woman's intention to conceive: “not with this partner”. Family Planning Perspectives 32(1): 39-45.



Inhaltsverzeichnisse und Leseproben sind frei zugänglich. Tables of Contents and Reading examples are freely accessible.
Vergessen Sie nicht das Login am Server, wenn Sie auf Kapitel zugreifen wollen, die nicht allgemein zugänglich sind.
Links zu diesen Dokumenten werden erst nach dem Login sichtbar.
Do not forget to Login on the server if you want to access chapters that are not freely accessible.
Links to these documents will only be visible after logon.

Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3402-3406, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400
https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at