Bild

Nomos, enklema und factum

    Philipp Scheibelreiter

Symposion 2017, pp. 211-250, 2019/02/27

Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Tel Aviv, 20.- 23. August 2017)

€  75,-- 

incl. VAT

PDF
X
BibTEX-Export:

X
EndNote/Zotero-Export:

X
RIS-Export:

X 
Researchgate-Export (COinS)

Permanent QR-Code

Abstract

Due to the sources, beside the parties’ names and the demanded penalty (timema), a plaint (enklema) contained the description of the matter of fact (pragma) and the rule (nomos) that, according to the claimant, had been violated by the defendant. This pattern (that could also fit with the basic structure of the Roman actiones) shows that it were the parties who, when preparing an action and therefore writing an enklema, had to suggest in which way the opponent’s behaviour had violated which law.

Keywords: enklema, subsumption, anakrisis, procedure in iure, epigramma